In Rhin-Meuse hydrological basin (North-East of France), local authorities have encouraged the setup of
Surface Flow Treatment Wetlands (SFTW) at the outlet of several small communities wastewater treatment
plants. These systems are devoted to effluent polishing by providing potential pollutant mitigation
effects. However, such systems are designed mainly empirically and resulting surfaces and shapes may
not be optimal. In the present study, the hydrodynamic behavior of three full-scale SFTWs used for sewage
tertiary treatment was assessed by means of multi-tracer experiments involving two fluorescent
dyes: uranine and sulforhodamine B. Residence Time Distribution analysis shows that the three investigated
wetlands displayed very different hydrodynamic properties. Mean residence times were lower in
the ditches (1–3 h) than in the pond (mainly 20 h). The effective volume ratio was very low for all investigated
wetlands. Sediment deposition as well as vegetation cover development may explain this result.
Ditches behaved as Plug-Flow Reactors with dispersion whereas the pond underwent strong internal
recirculation. The influence of vegetation cover on hydrodynamic dispersion was evidenced as it induced
long tails in the tracer breakthrough curves. Three systemic model structures are proposed to describe
wetlands hydrodynamics: combination of ideal reactors (Plug Flow and/or Continuous Stirred Tank Reactors)
with varying degrees of complexity were able to reproduce accurately the experimental Residence
Time Distributions. Combination with a first-order kinetic model allowed photochemical decay of
uranine to be described. In the future, combination of the proposed hydrodynamic models with more
complex kinetics models will constitute a valuable tool for process understanding and optimization.

En France, le bon état des ressources en eau souterraine est un enjeu majeur pour l’alimentation en eau potable des territoires. Pour préserver ou reconquérir la qualité de cette ressource précieuse mais peu visible, les gestionnaires doivent définir et mettre en œuvre dès aujourd'hui des actions de protection qui vont générer des coûts immédiats pour des bénéfices futurs difficiles à évaluer, souvent incertains et peu perceptibles pour les acteurs des territoires concernés. À travers l’analyse économique comparée de plusieurs stratégies d'action, cet article propose un éclairage sur les implications économiques des choix de protection des eaux souterraines pour l’alimentation en eau potable.